Skip to main content

3,672

In one of the early episodes of Batttlestar Galactica (2000s series) the President carefully writes down the number of surviving humans on the band of surviving spaceships on a whiteboard. She adjusts the number with each news report of loss of life.

That reminds me of the situation we're in now in British Unitarianism. We passed a resolution in 2006 calling for growth, and it's taken five years before we have publically published what our actual membership numbers are. So here it is: 3,672.

Even that number has not been officially published, but added up by someone in America. If any British Unitarians are not paying attention to what Scott Wells is writing, particularly here, then you should be. We all should be.

And we should realise that our situation is exactly that of Battlestar Galactica. We are a surviving band. There is much too much complacency still. The next ten years will be vital.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is actually far worse than anyone will admit to. There is a demographic time bomb waiting to explode under these figures.

My guess is a critical factor is how many people are there in the smaller groups under 65-70.

If there are only one or two then start writing the group's obituary. There will be no-one left to do the basic grunt work to keep going, never mind grow.

There are one or two groups out there who will cease to be viable during the next few years. Once they've gone,that's a local presence wiped out.

However, as many of the 75-80s have done nothing to pass their legacy on and kept it as their own safe/comfort zone, what could be expected?

Their groups die out with them.
I am very tempted to say "Tough"!
1:59 pm
Scott Wells said…
Thanks for noting my blogging. I do want to help.

You should insist on having Jamie Bamber play out in the televised Unitarian series.
3:00 pm
Robertson said…
'Anonymous' is correct in much of his/her analysis ; had I been at Swansea as an 'outsider', I might have believed from all the talk of 'strategic priorities' that I was attending the annual meetings of a denomination ten times the size. The bright spot was the admission of Bangor Fellowship; I would suggest every church with more than 30 quota members ought to be 'planting' a new fellowship in its locality on the Bangor model-which if I remember correctly, began with 4 people!Even if it meant the parent group met less frequently ( they could repeat services in the new 'plant'!)Any church that didn't participate would effectively be saying they had nothing worth sharing beyond their own walls; as 'Anonymous' says,such groups will eventually die out.
9:32 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Radical?

When I started this blog nearly 4 years and nearly 300 posts ago one of the labels I used for it/me was "radical." Perhaps I used it a little unreflectively. Recently I've been pondering what radical means. A couple of things have made me think of this. Firstly this blog series from my friend Jeremy, which explores a distinction between "radical progressives" and "rational progressives." There is also this definition of radical, liberal and conservative from Terry Eagleton quoted at Young Anabaptist Radicals : “Radicals are those who believe that things are extremely bad with us, but they could feasibly be much improved. Conservatives believe that things are pretty bad, but that’s just the way the human animal is. And liberals believe that there’s a little bit of good and bad in all of us.” What interests me is finding a way to express the tension I feel sometimes between myself and the wider Unitarian movement. One way to express this is to say I tend
3 comments
Read more

What does it mean to be non-creedal?

Steve Caldwell says "The problem here isn't humanism vs. theism for theist Unitarian Universalists -- it's the non-creedal nature of Unitarian Universalism" This is a good point. We need to think much more deeply about what it means to be a non-creedal religion. The first thing I want to say is that there is more than one possible understanding of non-creedalism. The Disciples of Christ are a non-creedal church, they say here : " Freedom of belief. Disciples are called together around one essential of faith: belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Persons are free to follow their consciences guided by the Bible, the Holy Spirit study and prayer, and are expected to extend that freedom to others." Quakers are also non-creedal and say here : Quakers have no set creed or dogma - that means we do not have any declared statements which you have to believe to be a Quaker. There are, however, some commonly held views which unite us. One accepted view is that th
3 comments
Read more

What is Radical Christianity?

Radical Christianity is about encountering the God of love . It is first and foremost rooted in the discovery of a universal and unconditional source of love at the heart of reality and within each person. God is the name we give to this source of love. It is possible to have a direct and real personal encounter with this God through spiritual practice. We encounter God, and are nourished by God, through the regular practice of prayer, or contemplation.  Radical Christianity is about following a man called Jesus . It is rooted in the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet living under occupation of the Roman Empire two thousand years ago. It understands that's Jesus' message was the message of liberation. His message was that when we truly encounter God, and let God's love flow through us, we begin to be liberated from the powers of empire and violence and encounter the  "realm of God" - an alternative spiritual and social reality rooted in love rather th
Post a Comment
Read more